Latest Photo: 8 weeks ago in Health
|
Friday, August 1, 2008
Your SFHomeless Group approaching 20,000 Page Views in 35 Weeks !
Saturday, July 19, 2008
2008 San Francisco Civil Grand Jury Report On Homelessness Just Released
Just releases from the SF Superior Court direct PDF libk to the report and also CW Nevuis wrote and article about it this morning and be sure to see the comments There's a few people saying what I've been saying for years. There are legions of drugged out crazies that live in supportive housing such as tenderloin Housing Clinic who do absolutey nothing all day except hang out on the street and do the same thing they did before they were housed. And it took a Grand Jury to figure this out? Go back through the Tenderloin Housing Clinic section and you'll find plenty of the residents doing all sorts of nasty things on the street. See the SF Weekly article from last year because much of that is STILL going on, not just there, but in many THC supportive housing buildings
|
Monday, June 16, 2008
Fresno Mayor Alan Autry Apologizes for Their City's Mistreatment Of Homeless Residents - Can San Francisco Officials Admit Their Mistakes ?
Instead of running and hiding away from public view (as some Mayors and City Officials often do) Fresno's Mayor is stepping up to the plate and embracing his homeless community with stark and uncommon honesty.“The Court’s ruling and the settlement should send a strong message to other cities throughout our country that if they violate the rights of their most vulnerable residents, they will be held accountable,” said ACLU-NC staff attorney Michael Risher.
Plaintiff Al Williams suffered the effects of the raids on three occasions.
In addition to losing clothes and food, his wife’s wheelchair was destroyed and her medicines confiscated by Fresno police officers.
I felt like everything was taken away from me, but this settlement gives me hope for the future for myself and all the other people who suffered,” said Williams, who now hosts a local radio show in Fresno.
“Many homeless people lost everything they owned to the City’s trash compactors and bulldozers. With this settlement, they can access what has always been the solution to homelessness: a safe, clean place to live,” said Elisa Della-Piana, an attorney with the Lawyers’ Committee.
This Honorable Mayor He has invited a new Task Force 'to develop a blueprint for how to develop a Housing First model that will provide homeless people a place to live without pre conditions' .... 'There is no requirement on those individuals. I’m ready to go there'
This has happened here in San Francisco. Our property, family photos, medicine and many other valuable and personal property has been taken, lost, destroyed and confiscated by San Francisco Police Officers (SFPD), Department of Public Works (DPW), City contracted security officers and staff at tax funded homeless shelters, resource centers and parks.
To date, all we have gotten back for the property that has been taken away from thousands of our own homeless and poor residents here has been 'silence' and an occasional 'sorry about that' from our City Officials and the contracted workers and civil servants who have likewise broken laws and violated the Constitution by taking away our things of value away from us.
Our City Officials in San Francisco and all of our civil servants and contracted non-profits and security guard companies MUST be held ACCOUNTABLE for their wrongdoings just as the People of Fresno are holding their City Officials accountable.
The SFHomeless Yahoo! Group is now seeking to file a similiar suit to 'right the wrongs' of this City's Administration who, in great haste, ignorance and disrespect for the Constitution have also routinely been taking away our property for the past 15 years.
From perhaps as many as tens of thousands of our residents whose only real crime was to be poor and home-less in a City that has too many uncaring people ordering City Workers to do horrendous things that they would not do against a member of their own family but they followed orders and did these bad things against the Supreme Law of The Land.
Our City Officials and their workers have violated their oaths to the Constitution in order to cater to the whims of the non-homeless residents and business interests. They are not worthy of the offices that they hold because they failed to protect us, the most vulnerable members of our community and totally failed to protect our property. They have caused us all great harm and we are seeking adequate reparations.
Our plan is to seek a suit in the US District Court to right these wrongs and use the award to build our own systems, designed and managed entirely by our own local homeless and formerly homeless residents. We have doctors, lawyers, shelter directors, social workers and many other talented people who are now part of our home-less community.
We WILL NOT allow any award we recieve to fall into the hands of those City Officials, Agencies and Non-Profits Serrvice Providers whom have all FAILED US for the past 15 years.
We WILL NOT let any of them fool us again so they can continue their abuse of our people or allow them to steal any more money or food that is intended to be in our hands for our benefit, not for the benefit of the corrupted. Those days are over.
IF YOU HAVE HAD YOUR PROPERTY TAKEN OR CONFISCATED BY ANY CITY WORKER, POLICE OFFICER, SECURITY GUARD OR NON-PROFIT SERVICE PROVIDER STAFF, EMAIL US TODAY AND WE WILL SEND YOU A LINK TO OUR 'PROPERTY TAKEN' REGISTRY TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE INCLUDED IN ANY SUITS FILED.
IF YOUR LAW FIRM HAS EXPERIENCE IN CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AND HAS PRACTICED BEFORE THE US DISTRICT COURTS IN CALIFORNIA, WE WELCOME YOUR CORRESPONDENCE ON THIS IMPORTANT MATTER.
Finally, a big THANK YOU to Mayor Autry and the Honorable Judge Oliver W. Wanger for their courage and some restoration of dignity, respect and just compensation and compassion towards our brothers and sisters in Fresno.
BRAVO FOR YOUR GOOD WORKS.
Monday, June 9, 2008
Stay Informed and In Touch With SF Board of Supervisors Every Day !
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Amanda Witherell of the SF Bay Guardian Gets it Right On Homeless
Hat's Off To Journalist Amanda Witherell and her colleague, Bryan Cohen of The San Francisco Bay Guardian for their Courage.Their Recent Undercover Investigations of Tax Funded Home-less Shelters In San Francisco, Happened Right Before Our City's Board of Supervisors Were Starting To Vote On Shelter Standards Of Care.
Their report showed us all why these Standards of Care are vital because for almost 15 years, our non-profit contracted shelter providers and city agencies (like HSA, Human Services Agency) had failed to enforce existing contract requirements, let alone the fact that there were 'no real standards' of health, safety, hygiene, staff training being implemented, followed or enforced, in any of the 19 shelters and resource centers that serve close to 1,500 every day or every month in San Francisco.
They truly deserve nominations for The Pulitizer Prize for their in depth, unbiased, first-hand reporting.
They lived in the shelters to see, with their own eyes, all of the realities that lay in store for them inside our City's homeless shelters and resources centers.
They did not need to rely on any HSA Reports; Shelter Monitoring Committee Reports; press releases; glossy non-profit service provider promo videos; or even the homeless advocate reports from our Coalition On Homelessness, to come to their own conclusions about how our elderly, disabled, poor and home-less residents are 'really' being 'cared for' and treated at our tax funded, non-profit contracted shelter sites.
Public Officials, like Mayor Gavin Newsom seems to keep shutting down shelters (on short notice without stable replacements) and 24 hour 'drop in' centers like Buster's Place (which serves about 120 people a day) -- even through the whole City realizes that it's money well spent as 'human investments'.
In a recent press conference, the Mayor said he wanted to 'get out of the shelter business'.We want to be fair to the Mayor. We believe that perhaps, he wants to 'do the right thing' but unless he already 'knows the truth' or has people around him that he can trust to 'tell him the truth' then he is going to keep making the same mistakes and mis-spending of money because he's being kept 'in the dark'. Maybe that is why it 'looks like' he's not 'up to speed' with what's really going on and been going on in our homeless shelters. Maybe EVERYONE that has been making money off of the abuse and captivity has been lying about it, to all of us.
Well, we say this because we can't believe that's what the Mayor meant to say, (about closing down all the shelters or all except two) because just as you need different size measuring cups to move ingredients from one place to the other, to make a proper cake, you need to have all of the assorted sizes of cups to measure out the ingredients properly or you end up with a mess.
Similiar to that example, each 'place' that a homeless, mentally ill, disabled, elderly or poor person has to have services to meet their needs as they change and become more 'stable'. It's not an 'either-or' proposition.It's about 'quality', 'quantity' and value (performance) of the ingredients (resources) that go into the mix of 'taking care' of our people with their unique and diverse needs.
You can't decide to eliminate ingredients in a recipe that you do not like and expect to come out with a winning meal. Each ingredient must be 'balanced' in value and proportion to the other ingredients to make it all 'work together'.
If you try to bake a cake and the yeast is rotten, then you don't just stop using yeast...
No, you would replace the box of yeast or replace the supplier (if their products or services could not be trusted), but you would continue to work with each ingredient because they are all necessary for the entire recipe to work.
We must have places for people to go that are safe and humane. Shelters are just one necessary step. It's part of a larger pipeline.
Others are transitional housing, SRO's and supportive housing and in certain cases, some sort of medical 'respite'.
Some people, no matter if they are on the streets or in an SRO or shelter or friend's couch, need a safe place to go, like a 24 hour center, even if its just a few nights a month to 'get away' and 'be safe' from bad or hostile home environment.However, it's a continuous 'path' moving people from streets all the way to affordable housing which means not everyone should be at the 'same' type of place or need all services offered.
Every one has different needs, but what they all have in common, is the need and the right to be safe and taken 'good care' of, for as long as needed, at any place they go to.One cannot replace the 'shelter beds' with 'respite' beds or 24 hour drop in center chairs; it's not like that. Each place and each type of place has it's own unique set of resources and fills certain needs.

What Is A Monopoly ?
Monopoly (economics), economic situation in which only a single seller (or 1 or 2 sellers) or producers supply a commodity or a service.
For a monopoly to be effective, there must be no practical substitutes for the product or service sold, and no serious threat of the entry of a competitor into the market. This enables the seller to control the price.
Wiping out competition & resident's choices, by City Officials expressing a desire to 'close all shelters' except the two largest (which would create a grotesque monopoly or bi-monopoly, leaving us all with just 2 shelter providers) shelter providers, that have not performed, nearly as well, as their smaller non-profit competitors) is like some sort of a 'non-profit' mad dictator's dream.
It surely does NOT represent the will of the people and residents that live and work at all the shelters, resource centers, and service provider facilities.
That means it's bad for everyone and the real motives or reasons are either not clear or are not being given to us, or they do not exist.
Investments made by us now, in standards and true shelter reform, will give us great returns because it insures the health, safety and enabling of our residents to get through the shelters, faster, onto their next step.
That's a lot cheaper than paying for preventable 'premium' costs associated with emergency response and treatment of people, later, who are 'loose in the streets' that need our help but have no place to go to 'be safe' because of short sided budget cuts.
We're talking about a couple hundred people a day, (elderly, disabled, mentally ill and women) at risk, due to our Mayor's 'cuts' -- to the only 24 hour center we have.
These short sided cuts perpetuate cycles of much higher costs (later) due to gross overtime pay to police, fire and medical response personnel, who's services could have been shifted elsewhere, if we had more shelter beds and 24 hour centers.
It's a no-brainer... but no one except a few 'elected servants', as seen by their own press releases and speeches, appear to want to keep putting the cart in front of the horse and they cannot seem to articulate 'reasons' behind the cuts... they just repeating repeating 'we have ot make the cuts' like trained parrots or puppets.Who is pulling their strings to run up costs (misuse of our tax money and community donations) and cause us more suffering, instead of just doing 'what the people want'.
Which is -- to save tax money and prevent harm, suffering and premature death or aggravation of mentally ill residents. ???Whose money is it, anyway ?
It's not the Mayor's money, it's Our Money.
We all pay these taxes, so why isn't it being spent according to Our Will ?If we want to spend the money now to help people and save a lot more that won't have to be spent on emergency and crisis services later, why can't we ?
Makes no sense when they are unable to 'tell us' why and give us sound reasons for the ridiculously expensive cuts to Buster's Place, shelter beds and mental health services.
Is someone actually profitting politically or monetarily off the backs (and the blood) of our City's homeless ?
Is that what this is all about ? We know we can greatly reduce overtime pay and premium emergency response and treatment costs (and reduce crime!) by taking good care of our elderly, poor, sick, veterans and homeless residents now, instead of waiting until they are 'abandoned' and thrown out to the streets which will result in more injury, sickness, crime, emergency response and possible accidental death by officer shootings.
So, tell us again, why are we NOT spending the money up front now, as an investment ?
Why are we shutting down the only 24 hour center we have ?
Why is the Mayor and the HSA Director Trent Rohrer, slashing away a million dollars worth of 'slightly' mentally ill health care services ?
And why are we NOT holding individual cheaters, thieves, abusers and drug dealers working on staff at some shelters and resource centers accountable for their wrong doing ?
And why are we not encouraging 'clean' shelter operators to come and bid for new 24 hour centers, shelters and resource centers ?
Oh. We almost forgot. What about those SRO's (Single Room Occupancies) that are being used as psuedo-apartments ? We are seeing some 'new ' ones, that look like someone took a single studio and chopped it into two new 'micro' studios.
We all wonder how many of our City's SRO's are doing electrical work and tearing open abestos filled walls, WITHOUT THE PROPER BUILDING PERMITS and WITHOUT A QUALIFIED, LICENSED CONTRACTOR....
Kind of like building little cell-like boxes to warehouse people in. I bet someone is making a fortune off of these 'deals' that result in more people being given less space, and their human rights, dignity and 'comfort' and health are being stripped away like a banana peel in the hot sun.
We look forward to more reports like these from this 'duo' of journalists in the future and if we could only get more journalists in the Bay Area to follow your lead and give us 'the facts' so that as a community, we can decide what's best for ourselves without all the lying, cheating, corruption and selfishness ...
Have A Great Weekend. Stay Safe Wherever You Are !
Tags: ada | harm | San Francisco | 24 hour drop in | Abuse | amanda witherell | buster's place | dignity and respect | disease prevention | dph | elderly | Health | homeless | homeless shelter | hsa | human investment | lack of standards | MONOPOLIES | non-profits | real life | risk | sfbg
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
San Francisco InterFaith Winter Shelter Said 'No Christmas Breakfast' to homeless guests.

San Francisco, California - December 25, 2007 -
There Was No Christmas Breakfast for the Homeless San Francisco Residents Staying At the Gough Street Church - Winter Shelter (St. Mary's Cathedral).
SF City InterFaith Winter Shelter Program operated by ECS ( Episcopal Community Services ) gave the homeless guests staying at St. Mary's Cathedral at 1111 Gough Street, an early morning, Christmas Day Surprise, this year.
When the homeless guests were woken up at 5:30am, they were told by ECS Staff/Volunteers, - Sorry, but you do not get any Christmas Day Breakfast, today. The cooks did not come in today. -
We've received many conflicting reports about exactly why there was no breakfast, today, this Christmas Day 2007, for the Church's homeless and poor guests.
Some staff and shelter guests say that cooks or volunteers (not the visiting Church Member Volunteers who were 'fantasticly nice to the homeless').
Only some ECS Staff, the Site Manager/Supervisors and ECS Volunteers were mentioned negatively (by other staff, guests and witnesses reporting here).
Guests were told that 'the cooks' just did not show up today, so the guests were asked to leave the overcrowded church, early this morning, without coffee or breakfast which the InterFaith Flyers had promised. Not even a snack or a cup of coffee. Merry Christmas, huh ?
Others say that ECS had no intention of providing a Christmas Breakfast, so no staff or volunteers were scheduled. [ and no advance notice given to shelter guests either ]
In any event, this Christmas Morning, our most needy residents left the shelter without food or drink, to start off their Christmas Day..
Several reports of ongoing abuse, neglect and lack of organization and 'people skills' have been following an ECS Supervisor named Antoine or Antwayn who has not been able to properly coordinate the 'entrance lines' to the shelter sites, being only 80 people at the last site ( Episcopal Trinity Church ) and now the current winter shelter site, St. Mary's Cathedral, having about 100 shelter residents.
In fact, racial slurs and jokes by ECS Senior Staff and 'clear hatred, contempt and arguing' against other staff members and against the homeless shelters clients, have been reported several times, by clients and trained observers, since the winter shelter program opened a few weeks ago.
The main cause now, of ongoing, multiple, repetitive complaints, seems to be centered around the ECS Site Supervisor (Antoine/Antwayn) who has made loud, public statements of hatred and contempt towards homeless clients, The City of San Francisco, whistleblowers.
Even a member of the Shelter Monitoring Committee, who bore witness as a 'regular shelter client' whom was not there on official committee business; when he, too received the brunt of several condescending, hated-filled remarks uttered by this ECS Supervisor. The Supervisor's conduct was outrageous.
All of this hatred on the part of an ECS 'Supervisor' on Christmas Eve -- without any apparent cause or provocation in front of about 120 homeless residents, waiting outside, in the cold.
This abusive behavior by staff and supervisors at homeless shelters, has been going on with the same shelter providers and often the same staff, for many years, now.
These known patterns of behavior by staff being paid with tax payer dollars, makes the best case story for the need for Hiring Standards, Performance Standards and Random Drug Testing for Shelter Staff and Supervisors.
Obviously, this Supervisor was upset and has been upset and 'taking it out' on his co-workers, shelter guests and apparently, anyone he wants to without proper supervision by ECS or The Church to prevent harm and abuse.
Can't we, as a unified, thoughful, intelligent, respectful community do better than this ?
What has to be done, in order to insure that people and non-profits that receive tax funding and donations treat everyone in our community, with reasonable dignity, respect and some sense of decency and humanity ?
[ Preliminary Complaints are outlined below. Details to follow. ]
Per SFGOV.ORG Website Link:
[ http://sfgov.org/site/mayor_index.asp?id=71056 ]
Dates of Site Operation: Dec 23�" Jan 17, 2007-2008
Site Name: St. Mary’s Cathedral, 1111 Gough
Operator: Episcopal Community Svcs. ( ECS )
Site Supervisor: Antwayn
Line Up Access Time: 6:30PM
Doors To Open At: 7:00PM ( or earlier if colder )
Curfew Bed Drop: 7:15PM
Services Contracted: Dinner and Breakfast provided
MAJOR ISSUES:
Multiple repeat acts of abuse, negligence, escalation of conflict, hate speech on the part of Same Staff, Same Supervisor, Same Shelter Provider, Multiple Sites.
New reports of non-provision of food, extremely cramped and unsafe over-capacity, unsanitary/health risk conditions, human rights violations and possible theft of resources destined for winter shelter residents (elderly, disabled, mentally/physically ill, homeless and veterans).
This Operator and Supervisor both have similiar previous, recent complaints reported by several dozen homeless clients, witnesses and staff, since Interfaith Winter Shelter Program Opened, to date, Christmas Day.
Numerous Breaches of Contract, Staff/Supervisor Dis-respect and blatant contempt shown towards homeless residents, elderly, mentally ill, other staff, volunteers and persons suffering traumas that are prone to seizures and suicidal tendencies. That can easily be triggered by undue stress, abuse, violence or lack of organization or with the presence of stress that comes from having large numbers of people, in confined spaces.
Later in the night, several reports of severe coughing with little or no attention by staff. No known reports of required 'excessive cough' reports by shelter staff in accordance with health and hygiene rules and guidelines set by SF Department of Health.
This is A Preliminary Summary - [ To be transcripted into formal, registered complaints and Petitions at a later date ], to wit :
On or about December 24th, 2007, the following items were duly observed, noted and reported, as follows [ detail to follow ]:
- Lack of adequate set-up and supervision of simple entrance lines and 'ticket checking' causing commotion and lengthy delays in getting people 'in out of the cold'.
Causes hostility and anxiety and is a bad example to set staff conflicts in front of anxious residents.
Victims of recent crimes and violence start to become very agitated and nervous. Some clients leave shelter to find peace and calm.
Their contractural, statutory and human right to quiet enjoyment of their shelter stay has been violated repeatedly by shelter staff and supervisors lack of skill, competence, experience and caring whose conduct and contractural duties have been performed in a megligent manner, in violation of City Shelter Contracts and law.
3. Lack of Supervisor and Staff Respect towards residents.
4. Lack of Supervisor respect towards City agencies and committees dedicated to serving the community.
5. Failure to show proper direction to confused residents who were given contradictory instructions to enter and then exit the building without proper explanation.
They were told 'I do not give a fuck if you go left or right or get the fuck away from here. I do not care about you. I do not give a fuck what anyone puts in their little city reports. I do not have any dignity or respect for none of you motherfuckers here
right now' and other words to that affect.
6. Failure to maintain order and affect an orderly entrance into the facility. Creating a safety hazard.
7. Failure to plan, provide or give notice to residents that Breakfast was NOT going to be served on Christmas Day due to lack of planned event by ECS or The Church.
8. Failure to allow cold, hungry residents timely access to shelter. Shelter opened late.
Management failed to maintain order and caused great stress, hositility and anxiety because of his disrespectful, agressive and negative predispostion, demeanor, hostility and outright hatred and contempt for the homeless residents.
The Supervisors speech, demeanor and hostile conduct was repeated and demonstrated 'bad faith' on the part of ECS, as it was again directed with hatred towards both 'The City of San Francisco" as party to the contract and a member of the
Shelter Monitoring Committee, who was present that night in his status as simply a homeless shelter resident who had not spoken much (keeping a low profile to just enjoy Christmas Eve).
That shelter resident was ;called out', first by that ECS Supervisor and whose character was personally attacked and ridiculed without just cause, by the ECS Supervisor, in front of all of the residents causing some fear mixed with hostility towards Supervisor, Staff and ECS, as an organization.
Committee Member refrained from responding to Supervisors inappropriate and offensive behavior. But did notify other staff and city agencies of what was witnessed, first hand.
And attempted to calm down the residents and agree to support their legitimate complaints, as a first hand witness.
9. Lack of professionalism and hostile behavior by Supervisor gave rise to 'panic attacks' on 2 physically/mentally ill residents and even others that were not ill, become hostile and angry.
10. Residents gave sound, polite advice for Supervisor to just ask everyone with tickets to hold up theirs and move left and all others without tickets to move right.
Several helpful and knowledgeable (from prior experience) suggestions by the homeless residents and were ignored and ridiculed by Supervisor.
11. Instead of using 'time tested' historically proven correct and proper methods of 'basic ticket checking, line setup and safe crowd control ' well known' to many old time homeless persons that had been going to that particular location many times over several years.
This new, unorganized and chaotic 'method' used by this ECS Supervisor was the opposite of the regular procedure that used to actually keep everyone out of the cold and get them in faster and safer.
Prior year's methods also kept out all non-ticket holders by having one person a ways outside the door, checking for tickets; prior to entering facility (lobby hall).
And a table in the lobby hallway to double check tickets, organize and control the orderly flow of residents into the kitchen, dining and sleeping areas.
This method used by Supervisor this time and at the previous Winter Shelter Location at Trinity Church, have resulted in wasted space, time, energy, resources and forced everyone to remain outside until about 7:38p or 7:48p, in the cold,
confused. And with lots of conflict.
Also, when residents tried to sign their names next to the 'line number' on the sign in sheet that corresponds to their Ticket Number, they were told 'not to do that'.
They were told to 'sign in' onto any next blank line, on the official sign in sheet.
Later, several residents that lost tickets, were unable to use the lists to verify their 'non-use' or 'mis-use' of their number, simply because staff and supervisor failed to maintain a 'normal' list that has one numbered line per numbered ticket.
Built in lack of accountability for 'checking tickets' for reasons unknown that did cause harm and confusion for the shelter guests that wanted to be accounted in the proper order.
It is well known that tickets have been 'resold' for as much as $50 and $100 and without proper line management, planning, sign in sheet accounting, one cannot have any peace, sense of order, accountability or contractural compliance, due solely to lack of proper behaviors and following known procedures on the part of staff and management.
All of this has caused harm and abuse to the shelter guests and are violations of contractural and moral obligations to 'take reasonable care' of the residents, the facilities and to maintain 'dignity and respect' for shelter residents and not to do anything that violates health, safety, fire and building codes and laws.
12. Only approximately 40 jackets were given out and instead of giving them on a truly 'first come first serve basis' everyone that had waited longest and were inside
in the correct order, got shoved back in the chaos.
The chaos initially started do to a late opening of the doors and later escalated greatly, when this Supervisor forced everyone out with abusive, threatening and demeaning verbal commands.
And did so without proper and clear advanced instructions, coordination, planning or orderly execution which allowed all kinds of people to 'get ahead' of the others ( line cutting that was reported against same provider and staff at the last site ago ) that had been waiting the longest.
Several staff members also 'took their jackets first' instead of giving them to others in greater need. Altogether about sixty or more guests failed to receive a jacket.
Although is has been noted and reported that staff members of other ECS Shelters also received the identical jackets from the same purchase or donation that was reportedly intended as 'Christmas Gifts' for the homeless shelter residents who
are indigent, elderly, disabled and mostly poor in resources.
FULL DETAILS AND REGISTERED REPORTS AND PETITIONS SHALL BE FILED WHEN ALL INTERVIEWS ARE COMPLETED.
ALL GOOD SHELTER RESIDENTS, STAFF, MEMBERS OF CITY AGENCIES, COMMUNITY GROUPS AND OTHER SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTS ARE INVITED TO SHARE THEIR OWN OBSERVATIONS, TIPS AND MATERIALS ON THESE ISSUES VIA EMAIL TO: sfhomeless@yahoo.com
You will be issued a copy of the public version of final reports.
---- end of preliminary report ---
cc: DPH, HSA, SMC, COH, Applicable Church Councils, SFPD
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
Special Report - Homeless Connect -PCH#19 - 12/05/2007
SFHomeless Yahoo! Group
SPECIAL REPORT ON - Homeless Connect aka - PCH #19 - Wednesday, December 5, 2007 - Bill Graham Auditorium across from San Francisco City HallMerry Christmas To Our Homeless & Poor Citizens of San Francisco !
SFHomeless Connect (started by Mr. Alex Tourk, yep! They don't mention this on the current sfconnect.org web site... instead they say '... was started under Mayor Newsom' ... why rob credit from one of the project's main creators. Who would not want to give him credit and recognition on the site for the program he practically fathered ? ) came back to life in our town again, with all kinds of goodies for the good town folk.
ANYWAY, We're only going to touch a few good and few bad issues because overall, we like the idea of this event and hope to see many more, perhaps more often.
Let's start out with the morning line.
Between sunrise and 8:30 am, it looked like there was no event !
Small groups would go to the doors, get their time-stamped color coded ticket and take off to 'do their' thing until it was their time to 'get in line'. No huge crowds like a couple past events. No heavy police presence, just lots and lots of volunteers. That was a good thing. Keep the crowds thin and there's lesschance of conflct. Orderly.WAITING AT THE HOMELESS DAY CARE CENTER . . . AS USUAL . .
A large number of Homeless Connectees congregated around the Main Public Library, aka'Our Homeless Day Care Center'. There was a great deal of tension in the air this mornging, though. Burning in most homeless person's mind is a great and urgent need to get the very thing it is, their MOST URGENT priority.
And can you guess what it is... that most homeless people want every night ?
Something they dream about and hope for every day....
And, what do most home-less people want ? That's right, YOU GOT IT !!
100 Homeless People Surveyed - said..... DING! 'SAFE AFFORDABLE HOUSING' !The one thing most desperately needed is - safe, affordable, permanent housing.
They see what looks like a ton of money and human effort going into a lot of really 'neat' services and programs that move us around from place to place, several
times in one year or more. And when all is said and done; when their day is finally over, they are reminnded that they will not get the 'thing' that they need the most. Safe Housing.
Being homeless in San Francisco means being torn apart every day in so many ways.
Most shelters are in or adjacent to The Tenderloin or Sixth Street (SoMa) with hordes of dealers chattering 'chiva, chiva, chiva' or 'O-C, O-C, I got what you need...) which is strressful to non-drug addicts and drug addicts in recovery.
Beat cops are starting to make more of a presence (just like they used to) but without constant coverage and long term committment, the homeless are easy marks and totally outnumbered by dealers on the streets and inside the shelters. Guaranteed to lower street homicide
rates.
Who's stupid idea was it to take away beat cops anyway ?!
ALL statistics show that beat cops increase community ties, provide more leads and tips on dangerous criminals and reduce actual street crime and violence (costs less, too... duh !).
M O R E B E A T C O P S = L E S S V I O L E N C E - AND -
LESS STREET CRIMES ( Einstein... ) (less shootings, stabbings, etc.)
Our Homeless Community's Love-Hate Affair With SF Homeless Connect
Some of them burning money into Bush's pocket on commutes or riding unreliable Metro, losing sleep and spirit every day. Muni workers, other local and state employees and all kinds of service and restaurant and security staff are either being stripped of their consumable income due to low wages and outrage rents or they are living far away adding to the daily commute that is choking our City.
Anyway, more on Homeless Connect, today.
- The Morning Line up . . . .
Instead of having a well regulated 'gated' entrance into the beginning of the barricaded walk way, all kinds of people holding different ticket times were crowded, arguing and stressing on the lack of order in the line.There were two care takers with wheelchair clients in the line that were on the cell trying to get their right to be ahead of the line, by the door. Not buried in a barricaded walk way (with no 'safety exit' gaps') with unevenly placed security staff.
If a fight had broken out (there were several face to face confrontations on the corner and in the line) the people in the wheel chair could not have quickly fled or gotten out of the way. They would have been slammed up onto the metal barricades or knocked over and possibly trampled.
REAL HARM REDUCTION - REGULATE THE ENTRANCE INTO THE LINE BY CHECKING EVERY TICKET.
Most clubs, events raves, and concerts control access when using tickets. Single file line and noone gets into 'roped off' lines without the right ticket for the right line or the right time. To expect very hungry, often desperate and 'not 100% together' people to follow orders without proper checks and oversight is pretty short sighted.There were several dozen people in line that had the wrong ticket times and when the police officer came by with his megaphone to 'shout' that noone should be in line that doesn't have, for example, the 10am to 1015am salmon ticket should not be in line. He did not check.
All the cheaters, haters and line cutters just 'laughed' and made fun of the cop with the megaphone because it was like 'for show'. Nothing changed and no 'order' in the line was restored by his dramatic, megaphonic presence.
Another risky, tough decision making moment for the homeless. Now, the 'good homeless' that had the right ticket and were pissed off at the line cutters that pushed their way past us, had to decide between 'sucking it up' or risk getting into a fight and pulled from the line (and making a new enemy) because of a lack of experienced, professional line security....No one regulated the entrance to the line to require that the only people that were able to get into line were the right color and time ticket. That simple common
sense practice would have eliminated the tension, the stress, the line cutting, the arguments and the sheer number of people in line, in half at least.
'They were in wheelchairs . . . what's so hard to figure out about that... where were the 'supervisors' that were supposed to cruise around to fix
problems caused by the volunteers ? Lack of training... heck ! Why do disabled in this town always end up getting disrespected ? '
Have you ever seen a elderly man with a limp or a back problem or tremors 'shuffle' up to get a plate of food (real slow) and then watch him spill his juice and his food all over his tray and onto the floor as he 'shuffles' and hobbles back to his seat, at the back of a lunch room ? We have. It's heart breaking and gut wrenching to
watch.
Onward. another dozen guys cut past another group in line because the people with later time stamped tickets were just standing in a column with a crowd of others alongside them and noone could tell where was the true 'end' of the line or why the line was not moving. It caused confusion and anxiety.
Everyone that had not stayed at one of the few shelters that has sufficient breakfasts, were very hungry.The ones that got the lousy breakfasts or had to walk a mile or so with heavy bags and backpacks were irritable due to lack of energy. So, another group of a dozen starts cutting in line and by the time we got near the doors, they got shut, and we got delayed again by the cheaters with no sense that the security was even aware of the tensions in the crowd.
FINALLY, MADE IT TO THE CLIENT ASSESSMENT PART OF THE SHOW . . .
Going through the client assessment lines were fast enough, and we got these really tasty chocolate energy bars and corporate green tea.But when one volunteer (who was sending people to the intake tables, where other
volunteers held colored cards up in the air, signalling they were ready for another client), told the other volunteer, that two clients need someone that speaks Spanish.
So, it looks like all the volunteers need just a little training on how to refer clients to 'other language' volunteers to help the client get what they need without mistakes or embarassment. Several people raved about the chiropractor. Once again, they said 'no housing, just information' which was kind of predicted but, you could still see the sense of 'housing hopelessness' in the eyes of the homeless and the volunteers who had to clarify that for the non-believers.
Shelter reservations (money for non-profits which is not a bad thing in and of itself, but the money would be better spent on 'real housing') were available at a wide array of fine and not so fine shelters.
A lot ofthe homeless looked really messed up like they NEEDED to get off the street TODAY and it was so sad to see that all too familiar look on their face that says, 'fuck it, I give up look' when they realized there were not going to be offered 'housing' at the 'housing information' tables, again....
GET YOUR GRUB ON !
IS THAT LUNCH ORDER FOR HERE, OR 'TO GO' .. . .
The lunch was good and one could choose between turkey or veggie sandwiches, some decent minestrone looking soup, brown rice pilaf kind of side dish, coffee, apple juice and killer chocolate chip cookies !!Later in the day, we saw a woman walk back a block away from the library to get her cookie she left on the landscaped concrete bank. And that's when we noticed the Moo Cow milk cartons (which we will get into a little bit later in this posting...).
So, the food was good, the only real bummer, so far, was the lack of eyeglass, DMV ID services ran out early, as usual. And they had some realy cute little 'Christmassy' things (gifts?) on one set of table. GAAP (General Assistance Advocay Project) was there helping with GA related problems (man they work hard and take a lot of crap from their clients at their offices on Golden Gate).Gavin Newsom even walked by us with only a couple of visible body guards and we did not even recognize him.
He had ditched the suit and only had nice dress shirt (causal) being trailed by the
ever slightly interesting Abdallah, the self proclaimed 'homeless advocate for
17 years..' or something like that.
Heard a rumor that he helped 'blow the whistle' on a number of issues around the homeless rights and corruption, but he went too far and was purported to have 'written up' a homeless client that had plugged in his cell phone ( a violation of Next Door's Policies to plug in a cell phone, except the floor monitors and front desk not only plug their cell phones in but at night, the monitors watch DVD's with sound eliminating head phones all night ).
Uh, Oooohhhh.... Damn it! Just when it was all going so well....
THE BIG SHELTER SYSTEM CRASH !!
Then came the crash . . . yes, ladies and gentleman.THE NUMBER ONE NEED OF MOST HOMELESS WAS EFFECITIVELY DENIED TO EVERYONE ! HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM...
All of the computers for entering in data (unless entered into software programs running on a laptop or desktop) were rendered useless. No Shelter Reservations were possible because Homeless Connect lost all network connectivity for several hours.
What do they call that in the corporate world ? ? When they do process and task planning ? ?? Aw, yes, the Mission Critical task apparently had no redundant (duplicate) back up system in place. The entire 'shelter reservation' system, the single most important 'thing' needed by almost all homeless clients was rendered unavailable.
No manual hard copies of 'vacant beds/mats' no cell phone 'call in' reservation system, zip, zero, ,nada for nadia (nothing for nobody). Most clients were told that it
could be a few minutes to a couple hours until the system was back online. A Lack of Connection For The Homeless. And a lack of communication.
What makes it so irritating to the homeless people we have discussed this with over the years, is that there are dozens of computer techs tand people in all kinds of professions, hat are homeless and they cannot get work until they have certain things in place, like safe, reliable, long term housing.
It is rare for anyone to get up out of the shelter system because there are a million
ways that shelter life will trip up and mess up your working life.
Lack of sleep, lack of bus tokens, lack of storage space for work gear, lack of
reliability of 'wake up' calls, no access to telephones, care no cash or change
for laundry, phone calls, cell phone bills, no access to plug in cell phones,
not allowed to use cell phones or alarm clocks to wake up with.
Working a decent job where you cannot be late and must look sharp and be sharp just becomes nearly impossible when staying in most shelters. That is another 'captive shelter' reality.
When your most basic, 'normal' needs are denied or delayed you cannot keep a decent job because you will be late, you will not be performing well and you will likely lose serveral jobs while homeless, which all end up somewhere on your record or becomeS part of your 'reputation'.It wears you down quick and leads to a whole bunch of social, emotional, financial and physical problems.
If you got the right amount of sleep, got enough to eat and did not have to wait in
lines for hours just to get a bed for a night, most able bodied homeless people
would 'go to work' every day (if there is steady work available) just like they
used to....
WHERE ARE THE GOOD SHEPARDS AT - THAT WATCH OVER OUR TAX FUNDED SHELTER SHEEP !
Now, we are down to a couple of the bummers of homeless connect, but first, we need to give everyone a little background for reference.
SMC INSPECTION AT TENDERLOIN HOUSING
- ARE ANY OF YOU STILL WAITING TO BE HEARD !
Earlier in the day, we were talking to some homeless people that had been at Tenderloin Housing Cllinic, the other day, with about 35 people that had waited around for the Shelter Monitoring Committee to arrive for a prescheduled inspection (as opposed to 'surprise' inspections that they make without notice to catch the mice at play) and were told that it looked like only one person showed up from the SMC and they only stayed about ten or 15 minutes.It looks like alot of people had a lot more to say and did not have near sufficient time
(like they did a week or so ago at TARC) to bring out all of their issues.
The observations and experiences of each and every homeless person is very important information and should be kept quiet or be left unheard. Every action taken to help the homeless community comes directly from the sharing of their experiences with the entire SF community.
THE NEEDS OF THE HOMELESS IS BEST EXPRESSED BY THE HOMELESS.
YOU ARE THE ONES THAT MAKES THE DIFFERENCE. HOMELESS SHELTER RESIDENTS AND HOMELESS SERVICE CLIENTS NEED TO BE SMART TO MAKE ALL OF THEIR VOICES HEARD . . . ORGANIZE AND USE SIMPLE PETITIONS !
One thing that works for cure the 'lack of time' problem is what has been done at several shelters, with great success. Residents would hold their own private
meetings away from shelter staff and 'write up' all of their grievances from 20
or 30 residents at a time, in Petition format and everyone would sign off on
that, that were affected by the same issues.
Projects, work groups and activities that are going on with the Shelter Monitoring Committee's 'Shelter Standards of Care' legislation that is now winding its way down a treacherous path through unchartered waters around City Hall and various agencies and committees that all homeless people need to be aware of and be kept informed about.
We walked all around and saw lots of non-profits and city agencies, but there was no table at homeless connect, set up by the Shelter Monitoring Committee.
However, not all was lost. Several Members of the Shelter Monitoring were spotted, in attendance. We got to hear two committee members(one volunteer, one client) that were discussing these various homeless related issues (man, some of these members never seem to stop 'doing something' to help all of our homeless residents. We really appreciate the work that they have doneand expect a lot more from them, as time marches on.We did not mean to eavesdrop, but they were standing next to each other talking about this so we took notes...
Apparently, the only paid staff member that reports to the SMC is a woman that we have seen in action named Bernice Casey. She does the work of like 3 people and she usually does set up a booth at Homeless Connect.She is on maternity leave [ bless her and her baby(ies) ] and so that is why noone was here at the event. I guess for lack of planning or resources or organization or whatever, the SMC members themselves did not cover this slot.
The very people who are going to be most affected or dis-affected (we'll see how and who is going to really enforce the standards and laws that have NOT been for like ten years or more, now). ANOTHER MISSED OPPORTUNITY !! One of those two SMC Members stepped up in the conversation and offered to 'be there' for the next PCH, so, we'll see if he keeps his word on that. We all know the SMC has it rough with their star (and only) staffer out, but why didn't the SMC Members or the Chairperson make plans for coverage.... ???
THE GRAND FINALE !
THIS WAY TO THE EXIT PLEASE. WATCH YOUR STEP !
HEALTH ALERT !DO NOT DRINK THE CHOCOLATE OR WHITE MILK IN THE CARTONS... THEY ARE OUTDATED AND NASTY !!
And you had better 'watch your milk', too. Even though the exit line volunteers gave us a pretty good selection of drinks (except the weird Kellogg Special K20 Water with ZERO vitamins), fruit (yummy oranges), little mini cereal packets,
and KILLER CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES !!, we had to take exception to something that kind of made us sick. We are grateful but we'd like to see more
nutrition. More nutrition. More nutrition....

No. Really. We got sick off two items that we were given that was a 'preventable' thing if someone had stopped for a moment and read a label. We were given Crystal Brand White and Chocolate Milk (in cartons) that was out of the 'use by' date for almost a week.
Crystal White & Chocolate Milk in Cartons - Rotten
Chocolate Milk Dated Nov 30 - Lumpy & Chunky
Lowfat White Milk Dated Nov 29 - Sweet & Sour
We saw angry homeless people throw their milks down onto the sidewalk, in front of the library, as they choked and puked on the sour, back dated milk. Lumpy, lumpy chocolate milk and sickly sweet and sour white milk.

Hopefully, we will never see this again... And, of course, we checked out cartons that were left on top of trash cans, all around City Hall and the Tenderloin.
The only milk we found that had a 'good' date was one that was very cold and had been stamped differently - because it likely came from a local store.
Every other carton we came across from PCH#19 all had bad dates....
Got Housing ? No, but we got Milk !
-- END OF REPORT --
Thanks to Tina, Elisha, Bob, Tyrone and Jonathan for the great info ! Keep your eyes open.... allways...
About Our SF Homeless Group
- SFHomeless Yahoo! Group
- San Francisco, CA, United States
- Group of independent homeless and formerly homeless residents of San Francisco that care and work about improving the quality of life of all San Franciscans, but especially the poor and homeless residents who need and deserve our understanding and honest caring.


